The Articles of Impeachment against Chief Justice Renato C. Corona . including paragraphs and , of the Impeachment Complaint and on all the Articles. The impeachment complaint against Chief Justice Maria Lourdes Sereno comes 5 years after her predecessor, the late Renato Corona, was. Tragically, the Verified Impeachment Complaint is not such a noble impeachment of Chief Justice Corona; facially, it is a challenge to certain.
|Genre:||Health and Food|
|Published (Last):||23 December 2011|
|PDF File Size:||4.52 Mb|
|ePub File Size:||6.58 Mb|
|Price:||Free* [*Free Regsitration Required]|
Documents on the Corona impeachment trial | Official Gazette of the Republic of the Philippines
They then had a direct examination on Emma Abanador, the Office of the Vice President’s administrative officer. Perez and Jose C.
Three of the bank accounts, Estrade noted, were closed on December 12,the day Corona was impeached. Indeed, preordained conformity is anathema to a democratic system. Corrona, impeachable officers will be vulnerable to scheming individuals concocting sham impeachment charges to accomplish their selfish agendas.
He furthers on that the matter is with the Senate and says the process is ongoing. The impeachment complaint against Corona was first taken up in a caucus of members of the Impeachmeny of Representatives allied with the ruling Liberal Party.
Majority floor leader Complanit Sotto said, quoting a report from the Sergeant-at-Arms, that no small lady was seen from their CCTV; Enrile then gave the prosecution 24 hours to explain how they acquired the bank records. League of Cities v.
How similar are the Sereno and Corona impeachment cases?
The Court shall, in consultation with its Members, decide on what action it will take. Atienza testified that the sale, which cost the city 34, pesos, was legal. Lito Atienzathe former mayor of Manilawas the defense’s next witness. The other branches must make use of other powers granted them by the Constitution in their effort to bring the Court to book.
Articles of Impeachment against Chief Justice Renato Corona – Wikipedia
Mandanas quoted Speaker Feliciano Belmonte, Jr. Sections 3 aband c make reference to reports by a Member-in-Charge, viz.: Aside from the documents, the prosecution also asked for the appearances of Corona, his wife and impeqchment.
In this case, it complaibt Justice Conchita Carpio Morales herself who affirmed the Supreme Court’s power cotona determine whether the House of Representatives committed a violation of the Constitution or gravely abused its discretion in the exercise of its power of impeachment. We convene as a body of jurors to try and render judgment on the Chief Justice of the Supreme Court under the Articles of Impeachment filed with the Senate by members of the House of Representatives.
Visnar told the court that the Corona couple fully paid a 9. BGEIthe defense says Mrs. VIII of the Constitution provides: The Senate threw impwachment a motion to subpoena Chief Justice Corona, his wife and family by a vote of 14—6. At any rate, if the Impeachment Court decides to look into these two cases, then it may have to give the parties to the case the opportunity to be heard. The House of Representatives on Monday night approved cofona impeachment of Chief Justice Renato Corona for alleged graft and corruption, culpable violation of the Constitution, and betrayal of public trust.
Full text of Corona’s reply to the impeachment complaint vs him
Now therefore, be it adjudged that Renato Corona, is hereby convicted of the charge against him in Article II of the Articles of impeachment, so ordered. Corona was authorized to act in lieu of BGEI. In these proceedings, the responsibility of protecting the Judiciary belongs to the Senate.
She also voted against the burial of ex-president Ferdinand Marcos at the Libingan ng mga Bayani. Ronaldo ‘not obsessed’ by individual trophies Football. There is little doubt about the desirability of having a friendly, even compliant, Supreme Court as an ally.
Defense lawyer cited for contempt”. Almost instantly, some Members the of House resigned from the majority coalition, amidst complaints of undue haste in the filing of the Articles of Impeachment.
In effect, the Court allowed the filing of the second motion for reconsideration. Unfortunately, Campos did not say that the Supreme Court dismissed his petition by minute resolution because he erroneously appealed the ruling of the SEC to the Supreme Court instead of the Court of Appeals and because he failed to show that the SEC committed grave abuse of discretion in deciding the case against his company.
No matter how angry and frustrated either of the other branches may be by the action of the Supreme Court, removal of individual members of the Court because of their judicial philosophy is not permissible.