Relationship between ideology prejudice stereotypes and discrimination

Predicting Ideological Prejudice

relationship between ideology prejudice stereotypes and discrimination

The Relationships of Intergroup Ideologies to Ethnic Prejudice: A Meta- .. Handbook of prejudice, stereotyping, and discrimination (2nd ed.). on stereotyping, prejudice, and their relationship with . unwillingness to let go of their old ideologies. . times results in stereotyping and discrimination. Handbook of prejudice, stereotyping, and discrimination. later conceptions of right-wing authoritarianism discussed under Prejudice-related Ideologies. Find this In The social psychology of intergroup relations.

  • Predicting Ideological Prejudice

Directional predictions are one step in the development of theories and are often the stopping point in psychology Meehl, The first was the perceived political ideology of the target group. Prior research has found that people are prejudiced toward groups they see as having political values and identities dissimilar to their own e.

relationship between ideology prejudice stereotypes and discrimination

Conservatives tend to express prejudice toward groups perceived as liberal, and liberals tend to express prejudice toward groups perceived as conservative. I also included a measure of perceived conventionalism as an alternative, less direct measure of value dissimilarity on the political dimension.

Race Based Prejudice, Stereotypes, and Discrimination

Finally, the third group characteristic I considered was degree to which membership in the group is perceived to be a choice. The novelty of the research presented here is the idea that these group characteristics can be used also to predict the size of this association.

relationship between ideology prejudice stereotypes and discrimination

Liberals expressed more prejudice than conservatives toward groups perceived as strongly conservative, but this difference tapered off as the groups were seen as less clearly conservative and then flipped directions and strengthened as the groups were seen as increasingly liberal. This initial test was incomplete because it did not consider rival explanations, such as social status and perceived membership choice, and it did not test whether the model could accurately anticipate the size and direction of the ideology-prejudice association for specific target groups in new samples.

Prejudice and Stereotyping - Psychology - Oxford Bibliographies

Although most psychologists do not focus their theoretical and empirical energy on predicting effect sizes, models that make size predictions have substantial practical and theoretical value Meehl, Directional hypotheses do not make such distinctions. An accurate model that makes size predictions can be extended to new observations, beyond the original sample.

Social groups are not static entities; some groups rise to prominence, whereas others fade away, depending on the cultural zeitgeist or the issues at stake. General Overviews There are several books and chapters that offer a broad view of the social psychological research on prejudice and stereotyping. There are two texts that are excellent for undergraduates.

Culture, Prejudice, Racism, and Discrimination - Oxford Research Encyclopedia of Communication

First, Whitley and Kite covers the general field of research on stereotyping and prejudice, providing an excellent primer for theory and research on the causes and consequences of prejudice and stereotyping. Second, Stangor is a collection of key social psychological readings on stereotypes and prejudice.

relationship between ideology prejudice stereotypes and discrimination

The key readings text is especially useful, as it can be assigned in sections for a general class or used in its entirety for a class specifically on prejudice.

Beyond the introductory text and primer for key readings, though potentially unsuitable for undergraduate use, there are three chapters from the Handbook of Social Psychology that are useful for researchers who want to get an understanding of the progression of research and focus of current theory and research.

Although there is some overlap in the content of the three handbook chapters, each chapter makes a notably unique contribution that warrants their inclusion.

Culture, Prejudice, Racism, and Discrimination

Fiske provides a history and thorough review of influential perspectives on prejudice and stereotyping. Expanding on FiskeYzerbyt and Demoulin provides an additional in-depth perspective on theories of how groups are created and sustained. Dovidio and Gaertner focuses on the bases of group-based biases and provides a thorough consideration of theory and research on stereotype change and prejudice reduction.

Finally, in addition to the aforementioned chapters, Dovidio, et al.

relationship between ideology prejudice stereotypes and discrimination

In Handbook of social psychology. Edited by Susan T.